ABSTRACT
BackgroundLittle is known about the risk of Long Covid following reinfection with SARS-CoV-2. We estimated the likelihood of new-onset, self-reported Long Covid after a second SARS-CoV-2 infection, and compared to a first infection. MethodsWe included UK COVID-19 Infection Survey participants who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between 1 November 2021 and 8 October 2022. The primary outcome was self-reported Long Covid 12 to 20 weeks after each infection. Separate analyses were performed for those <16 years and [≥]16 years. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for new-onset Long Covid using logistic regression, comparing second to first infections, controlling for socio-demographic characteristics and calendar date of infection, plus vaccination status in those [≥]16 years. ResultsOverall, Long Covid was reported by those [≥]16 years after 4.0% and 2.4% of first and second infections, respectively; the corresponding estimates among those <16 years were 1.0% and 0.6%. The aOR for Long Covid after second compared to first infections was 0.72 (95% confidence interval: 0.63-0.81) for those [≥]16 years and 0.93 (0.57-1.53) for those <16 years. ConclusionsThe risk of new-onset Long Covid after a second SARS-CoV-2 infection is lower than that after a first infection for those [≥]16 years, though there is no evidence of a difference in risk for those <16 years. However, there remains some risk of new-onset Long Covid after a second infection, with around 1 in 40 of those [≥]16 years and 1 in 165 of those <16 years reporting Long Covid after a second infection.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
Background: The clinical sequelae (Long Covid) of acute Covid-19 are recognised globally, yet the risk of developing them is unknown. Methods: A living systematic review (second version). Bibliographical records from the C19 Living Map Long Covid segment (22nd February 2022), Medline, CINAHL, Global Health, WHO Covid-19 database, LitCOVID, and Google Scholar (18th November 2021). We included studies with at least 100 people at 12 weeks or more post-Covid-19 onset and with a control group without confirmed Covid-19. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Symptoms are aligned with the Post Covid-19 Condition Core Outcome Set. We present descriptive statistics and use meta-analysis to estimate the relative risk of experiencing Long Covid. Results Twenty-eight studies were included: 20 cohort, five case-controls, three cross-sectional. Studies reported on 242,715 people with Covid-19 (55.6% female) and 276,317 controls (55.7% female) in 16 countries. Most were of moderate quality (71%). Only two were set in low-middle-income countries and few included children (18%). The longest mean follow-up time was 419.8 (standard deviation 49.4) days post-diagnosis. The relative risk (RR) of experiencing persistent or new symptoms in cases compared with controls was 1.53 (95% CI: 1.50 to 1.56). The core outcomes with the highest increased risk were cardiovascular (RR 2.53 95% CI: 2.16 to 2.96), cognitive (RR 1.99; 95% CI: 1.82 to 2.17), and physical functioning (RR 1.85; 95% CI: 1.75 to 1.96). Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with a higher risk of new or persistent symptoms when compared with controls that can last over a year following acute Covid-19. There is still a lack of robust studies set in lower resourced settings and current studies have high heterogeneity and potential misclassifications of cases and controls. Future research should explore the role of vaccination and different variants on the risk of developing Long Covid.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
Background: Stigma can be experienced as perceived or actual disqualification from social and institutional acceptance on the basis of one or more physical, behavioural or other attributes deemed to be undesirable. Long Covid is a predominantly multisystem condition that occurs in people with a history of SARSCoV2 infection, often resulting in functional disability. Aim: To develop and validate a Long Covid Stigma Scale (LCSS); and to quantify the burden of Long Covid stigma. Design and Setting: Follow-up of a co-produced community-based Long Covid online survey using convenience non-probability sampling. Method: Thirteen questions on stigma were designed to develop the LCSS capturing three domains: enacted (overt experiences of discrimination), internalised (internalising negative associations with Long Covid and accepting them as self-applicable) and anticipated (expectation of bias/poor treatment by others) stigma. Confirmatory factor analysis tested whether LCSS consisted of the three hypothesised domains. Model fit was assessed and prevalence was calculated. Results: 966 UK-based participants responded (888 for stigma questions), with mean age 48 years (SD: 10.7) and 85% female. Factor loadings for enacted stigma were 0.70-0.86, internalised 0.75-0.84, anticipated 0.58-0.87, and model fit was good. The prevalence of experiencing stigma at least 'sometimes' and 'often/always' was 95% and 76% respectively. Anticipated and internalised stigma were more frequently experienced than enacted stigma. Those who reported having a clinical diagnosis of Long Covid had higher stigma prevalence than those without. Conclusion: This study establishes a scale to measure Long Covid stigma and highlights common experiences of stigma in people living with Long Covid.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundMany people are not recovering for months after being infected with COVID-19. Long Covid (LC) is a major public health problem that needs defining, quantifying and describing. We aimed to explore and develop understanding of LC symptoms following mild/moderate COVID-19 infection and describe its impact on daily life.MethodsThe survey was co-produced with people living with LC. Data was collected through an online social media survey mostly from online support groups using convenience non-probability sampling. The criteria for inclusion were adults with lab-confirmed or suspected COVID-19 infection managed in the community (non-hospitalised) in the first two weeks of illness. We used agglomerative hierarchical clustering to identify specific symptom clusters, and their demographic, and functional correlates.ResultsData from 2550 participants with a median duration of illness of 7.7 months (interquartile range (IQR) 7.4–8.0) was analysed. The mean age was 46.5 years (standard deviation 11 years) with 82.8% females and 79.9% UK-based. 90% reported good, very good or excellent health prior to infection. Most participants described fluctuating (57.7%) or relapsing LC symptoms (17.6%). The most common initial symptoms that continued were exhaustion, headache, chest pressure/tightness and breathlessness. Cough, fever and chills were prevalent initial symptoms that became less so as the illness progressed. Cognitive dysfunction and palpitations became more common beyond the acute phase. 26.5% reported lab-confirmation of infection (NAAT or antibody). The biggest difference in symptoms between those who reported testing positive and those who did not was loss of smell/taste. Physical activity, stress and sleep disturbance were the most common symptom triggers. A third (32%) reported they were unable to live alone without any assistance at six weeks from start of illness. 66.4% reported taking time off sick, (median 60 days, IQR 20, 129). 37% reported loss of income due to illness. Eighty four percent of participants reported ongoing symptoms affecting at least three organ systems. There were two main ongoing symptoms clusters;the majority cluster (88.7%) exhibited mainly chest, cognitive symptoms and exhaustion, and the minority cluster (11.3%) exhibited multi-system symptoms which had persisted from the start. The multi-system cluster reported more severe functional impact.ConclusionThis is an exploratory survey of LC characteristics. Whilst it is a non-representative sample, it highlights the heterogeneity of persistent symptoms, and the significant functional impact. To better characterise ongoing illness and prognosis, research is needed in a representative population-sample using standardised case definitions (to include those not lab-confirmed in the first pandemic wave).
ABSTRACT
Many people are not recovering for months after being infected with SARS-CoV-2. Long Covid has emerged as a major public health concern that needs defining, quantifying, and describing. We aimed to explore the initial and ongoing symptoms of Long Covid following SARS-CoV-2 infection and describe its impact on daily life in people who were not admitted to hospital during the first two weeks of the illness. We co-produced a survey with people living with Long Covid. We collected the data through an online survey using convenience non-probability sampling, with the survey posted both specifically on Long Covid support groups and generally on social media. The criteria for inclusion were adults with lab-confirmed (PCR or antibody) or suspected COVID-19 managed in the community (non-hospitalised) in the first two weeks of illness. We used agglomerative hierarchical clustering to identify specific symptom clusters, and their demographic and functional correlates. We analysed data from 2550 participants with a median duration of illness of 7.7 months (interquartile range (IQR) 7.4-8.0). The mean age was 46.5 years (standard deviation 11 years) with 82.8% females and 79.9% of participants based in the UK. 89.5% described their health as good, very good or excellent before COVID-19. The most common initial symptoms that persisted were exhaustion, chest pressure/tightness, shortness of breath and headache. Cough, fever, and chills were common initial symptoms that became less prevalent later in the illness, whereas cognitive dysfunction and palpitations became more prevalent later in the illness. 26.5% reported lab-confirmation of infection. The biggest difference in ongoing symptoms between those who reported testing positive and those who did not was loss of smell/taste. Ongoing symptoms affected at least 3 organ systems in 83.5% of participants. Most participants described fluctuating (57.7%) or relapsing symptoms (17.6%). Physical activity, stress and sleep disturbance commonly triggered symptoms. A third (32%) reported they were unable to live alone without any assistance at six weeks from start of illness. 16.9% reported being unable to work solely due to COVID-19 illness. 66.4% reported taking time off sick (median of 60 days, IQR 20, 129). 37.0% reported loss of income due to illness, and 64.4% said they were unable to perform usual activities/duties. Acute systems clustered broadly into two groups: a majority cluster (n=2235, 88%) with cardiopulmonary predominant symptoms, and a minority cluster (n=305, 12%) with multisystem symptoms. Similarly, ongoing symptoms broadly clustered in two groups; a majority cluster (n=2243, 88.8%) exhibiting mainly cardiopulmonary, cognitive symptoms and exhaustion, and a minority cluster (n=283, 11.2%) exhibited more multisystem symptoms. Belonging to the more severe multisystem cluster was associated with more severe functional impact, lower income, younger age, being female, worse baseline health, and inadequate rest in the first two weeks of the illness, with no major differences in the cluster patterns when restricting analysis to the lab-confirmed subgroup. This is an exploratory survey of Long Covid characteristics. Whilst it is important to acknowledge that it is a non-representative population sample, it highlights the heterogeneity of persistent symptoms, and the significant functional impact of prolonged illness following confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection. To study prevalence, predictors and prognosis, research is needed in a representative population sample using standardised case definitions (to include those not lab-confirmed in the first pandemic wave).